Content Accuracy Review
Fact-check a piece of content for accuracy and produce a claim-by-claim verification report. First scopes the content and extracts every checkable claim (statistics, dates, quotes, attributions, causal and factual statements) and locks a verification standard, then verifies each claim against authoritative sources rating it true/false/misleading/unverifiable with the supporting evidence, then writes a report flagging every inaccuracy with the correction and source plus an overall trust rating. Use this for a fact-check, accuracy review, content verification, checking claims and statistics, source-checking an article, or vetting content before publishing — it returns a claim-level verdict backed by cited sources rather than a vague 'seems accurate'.
How it runs
| # | Step | Who runs it | What happens |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scope + extract claims | Reviewer | extract every checkable claim, lock the standard |
| 2 | Verify each claim | Researcher | check claims against sources, rate each |
| 3 | Write the accuracy report | Reviewer | claim-by-claim verdicts + corrections |
| 4 | Evaluate | Reviewer | Grade the deliverable against every acceptance criterion. All pass → finish; any fail → loop back and fix the gap. |
| 5 | Finish | Developer | All acceptance criteria met. Stamp a short summary and report DONE. |
Say something like "fact check this" or "accuracy review" or "verify these claims" or "is this content accurate" or "source-check this article" or "vet this before publishing" in chat to start it.