Source Quality Audit
Once a month, make the reading list earn its place: score each source on what it actually delivered — accuracy, originality, noise — and keep, demote, or drop with evidence, so the brief stays sharp as the feeds drift. Locks the audit criteria FIRST, then builds the per-source scorecard from the month's briefs, then writes the verdict table with the changes to make. Use for source audits, pruning the feed list, 'the brief feels noisy', monthly reading-list reviews, and deciding which feeds to drop.
How it runs
| # | Step | Who runs it | What happens |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scope the audit | Reviewer | roster read, evidence base gathered, verdict rules locked |
| 2 | Build the scorecard | Reviewer | per-source evidence: delivered, corrected, or silent |
| 3 | Write the audit report | Copywriter | verdict table plus the changes to make |
| 4 | Evaluate | Reviewer | Grade the deliverable against every acceptance criterion. All pass → finish; any fail → loop back and fix the gap. |
| 5 | Finish | Developer | All acceptance criteria met. Stamp a short summary and report DONE. |
Say something like "audit the sources" or "the brief feels noisy" or "review the reading list" or "which feeds should we drop" or "source quality audit" in chat to start it.